What is the role of carbon offsetting in helping companies reach the 1.5˚C target?

March 10, 2022

At the end of February, we held part 1 of our seminar series on carbon offsetting. Here are some key points from the seminar and a link to the recording for those who want to watch it in full.

The 1.5°C target under the Paris Agreement - this is the target we aim to achieve. We do not want the global temperature increase to go higher than this, as the consequences for people and nature will be too severe. Today, at the beginning of 2022, we unfortunately already have a temperature increase of around 1.2°C. The IPCC has now concluded that time is too short to reduce emissions alone, and that other measures are needed to absorb and sequester what we have already emitted. By 2050, the world's greenhouse gas emissions must be balanced against the amount sequestered. For businesses and organizations, this means using all the tools in the box, one of which is voluntary carbon offsetting, which, if used responsibly, can accelerate action to curb dangerous climate change.

 

Voluntary offsetting is currently a very small part of the measures used in the pursuit of the 1.5˚C target, and it would need to be scaled up significantly during this decade. With each passing year, the costs of dealing with various impacts linked to climate change will become higher and higher. Meeting the cost today, for example through carbon offsetting, is cheaper than dealing with climate change in the future when it has worsened.

So what types of carbon offsets are there?

The projects can be divided into two groups - "Reductions" and "Removals". In the past, renewable energy projects, such as wind farms in China and India, have been the most common. Today, however, these projects have very low or no additionality, i.e. the projects would most likely have been implemented even without money from carbon offsets. In addition to a project's CO2 credits being measurable, verifiable, traceable and durable, the requirement for additionality is central - money from carbon offsetting must make a real difference. Today, the renewable energy market stands on its own two feet and does not need funding from carbon offsetting to operate and thus additionality is low.

In the debate about net-zero and climate neutrality in terms of emissions, there is currently a strong focus on negative emissions, i.e. "Removals". This includes natural climate solutions such as tree planting which, thanks to photosynthesis, absorbs and stores carbon dioxide. ZeroMission has worked with Plan Vivo tree planting projects since 2006 and today has several different projects in our portfolio. There is also ongoing development of technologies to store or sequester carbon permanently, for example in the bedrock. These are technologies that the world is waiting for, but today there is no such technology that is certified according to the standards that exist for voluntary climate compensation. In addition, there are only a few pilot projects in the world and the prices per ton are still very high compared to, for example, tree planting.

 

As with most things, you get what you pay for. Old credits with low real climate impact are cheap, while credits with high additionality and positive co-benefits cost more. In between, there are of course projects all along the 'benefit scale'. At ZeroMission , we have high demands on the projects we sell credits from, so if you choose to offset through us, it will have a good effect on the climate. For many years, we have also had a policy that our projects should also have a positive effect based on several of the UN's sustainability goals, such as contributing to jobs locally. In this way, we believe that our customers sleep well at night - the voluntary carbon offset you pay for provides real benefits both for the planet and locally in the projects.

To conclude, we are happy to repeat our mantra on how we think companies and organizations should act to accelerate the transition of our society: Measure - Reduce - Commit (Climate Compensate). Measure your emissions, reduce in line with the Paris Agreement's 1.5˚C target and at the same time take responsibility today for the emissions you have over time. Preferably by carbon offsetting in projects that bind carbon dioxide - this is the most credible and serious way to act and, as stated above, it is needed to meet the target.

We run part 2 of the series The March 17, Part 3 on April 7th and Part 4 on May 12th. Read more and sign up here.

 

If you want to see the seminar in full, it is available below. ZeroMission's CEO, Claire Wigg, and Johanna Brunge Grant, Climate Strategist, will moderate and answer some listener questions at the end.

 

 

Latest News

Cookie settings
zeromission logo

We use cookies to give you the best possible user experience.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies are mainly used to ensure that the website functions as intended, both technically and visually. As these cookies are strictly necessary for the website to function, you cannot refuse them without affecting the functioning of the website.

Third party cookies

Our website may use third-party cookies from external service providers to improve functionality and analyze traffic. These cookies collect information to help us understand how the website is used. These cookies are set by third parties and may be used to track your activity across multiple websites.